Kubernetes security applies layered controls to containers, orchestration processes, and the surrounding cloud infrastructure. It safeguards against data breaches, service disruption, and unauthorized access by enforcing least privilege, securing APIs, and monitoring cluster activity. As Kubernetes bridges apps, infrastructure, and pipelines, its security becomes central to protecting cloud-native environments.
Kubernetes security governs the protection of containerized workloads and their orchestration across distributed environments. It spans the full attack surface, from infrastructure to applications, leveraging controls purpose-built for the platform’s ephemeral containers and declarative configuration model.
Every Kubernetes cluster introduces multiple layers of exposure — the control plane, the dataplane, and the workloads themselves. Each layer requires a set of defensive measures. You must lock down the kube-apiserver, monitor access to etcd, secure pod-to-pod communication, enforce least privilege through RBAC, and harden the nodes running the kubelet. A lapse in one area, such as an overpermissive role binding or exposed service, can unravel the system’s security posture.
Kubernetes offers control surfaces, but not policy coordination or integration. Security teams must design the enforcement architecture around it, aligning DevOps, SecOps, and CloudOps efforts. As attackers automate privilege escalation, lateral movement, and runtime exploits, defense must shift from reactive tooling to preemptive policy and hardened defaults.
Kubernetes security must be declarative, enforced by design, and sustained throughout both the deployment process and the platform’s ongoing operations.
Organizations rely on the cloud and cloud-native architectures, and Kubernetes sits at the core of that ecosystem. Yet securing Kubernetes remains a persistent challenge. In our State of Cloud-Native Security Report, 86% of respondents said security delays software releases, with nearly half regularly facing major hold-ups. Many of these delays stem from unresolved vulnerabilities and misconfigurations in CI/CD pipelines and infrastructure orchestration — areas Kubernetes directly controls. At the same time, 34% flagged CI/CD as a growing attack surface, and 43% cited API risks, both of which implicate Kubernetes. Like many cloud-native tools, in other words, organizations struggle with Kubernetes security.
Every delayed deployment costs the business time and money, on top of fines and revenue loss from security incidents.
Kubernetes orchestrates containerized workloads across cloud infrastructure, managing how applications are deployed, scaled, and operated. While not a security tool, it defines critical enforcement points such as access control, workload isolation, network segmentation, and runtime behavior.
Securing applications within the Kubernetes environment focuses on protecting applications from vulnerabilities and attacks by controlling what can access the cluster, how workloads interact, their privileges, and the flow of traffic.
Effective Kubernetes security requires coordination across the broader cloud environment, including securing CI/CD pipelines, hardened infrastructure, identity management, and monitoring systems that detect drift and anomalous behavior in production.
Kubernetes runs on infrastructure (e.g., AWS, Azure), and that infrastructure needs strong baseline security standards such as hardened OS, IAM controls, encrypted disks, etc. to prevent Kubernetes from inheriting concerns like node compromise and insecure storage.
If the infrastructure underlying the Kubernetes cluster is weak or vulnerable, the cluster is weak or vulnerable.
At the application layer, Kubernetes orchestrates your containers. Exposed ports and excessive permissions in your Kubernetes configuration can expose your app to compromise.
In 2022, nearly a quarter million Kubernetes clusters were publicly exposed through the default port 10250 used by the kubelet (the agent that runs on each node and ensures that all containers are running in a pod). Attackers can use this as an entry point to mine for crypto or execute commands inside containers or clusters. This vulnerability has its own MITRE ATT&CK framework designation: T1609 - Container Admin Command.
Orchestration begins in your CI/CD pipeline, automating the testing, building, and deployment stages of the application lifecycle. Because Kubernetes deploys code, the CI/CD pipelines that produce that code should be secure via image scanning, configuration validation, and signed manifests.
Related Article: Improper Artifact Integrity Validation
Kubernetes uses a flat network model, allowing pods to freely communicate within the cluster by default. Default settings, however, are typically less than ideal. In this case, the default enables attackers who compromise one pod to freely access all other resources in the cluster.
Network policies, such as virtual firewalls, secure Kubernetes pod-to-pod communications. Security teams should limit communication to the minimum necessary for workloads to function both ingress and egress and east-west traffic within the cluster.
Kubernetes usually employs service meshes like Istio and Linkerd to manage internal service-to-service traffic. This exposes APIs through ingress controllers and load balancers, so security depends on proper rules and protections within the mesh.
Use TLS to encrypt and secure communications for data transmitted over a network, web application firewalls (WAFs) help enforce rate limiting and enforce zero trust to ensure that only the necessary permissions are granted to each specific element.
Kubernetes comes with its own role based access controls, but it also ties into CIEM and SSO/IDP systems. Because Kubernetes supports so many authentication methods, managing them through RBAC alone can be complex, resulting in oversights that could expose the cluster.
Kubernetes identity controls must be tailored to fit the organization’s broader policies and include IAM security procedures and zero trust enforcement, to ensure only authorized entities can interact with the cluster.
Even one of these common security mistakes and vulnerabilities found in Kubernetes deployments can cause data breaches, allow malicious actors access to vital resources, and cost your business in downtime and regulatory fines.
Organizations are continuously working to improve Kubernetes security, both internally and in the open-source project. These Kubernetes security best practices have been identified over many years to address key security issues in a Kubernetes environment.
Enable role-based access control (RBAC) to limit the access an attacker can gain to the cluster if they compromise one account. When users and accounts are given excessive trust, they increase the attack surface. To mitigate this, create Roles or ClusterRoles, which contain rules representing permissions. A Role sets permissions within a particular namespace. ClusterRoles can grant the same permissions as a Role, but they’re cluster-scoped instead of namespace-scoped, meaning they provide access to cluster-scoped resources, nonresource endpoints, and namespaced resources across all namespaces.
Bind these Roles/ClusterRoles to users, groups, and/or service accounts — and apply least privilege. Support the principle of least privilege by adding namespaces for resource isolation, applying pod security policies, and securely managing secrets.
PSA enforces security standards on pod definitions at creation, helping you define how to restrict pod behavior. Prevent risky pod configurations using three pod security levels: privileged, baseline, and restricted.
You can also choose what mode PSA operates in when it detects a potential violation. Enforce rejects a pod, audit allows a pod but triggers an audit annotation to be added to the event and warn allows a pod but triggers a user-facing warning.
By default, Kubernetes pods aren’t isolated. They accept traffic from any source. Network policies act as a mini firewall inside your cluster, controlling which pods can talk to which pods. Without policies, all pods can talk to each other, and an attacker in one pod can easily move laterally.
You can also use service meshes (like Istio or Linkerd) to manage communication between services (clusters, pods, externally, etc.). They add observability, reliability, and security features across all services within the mesh, without needing to encode the features directly into each service.
Secrets contain the necessary information to decrypt data you’ve protected through encryption and are often stored in etcd, a key value store used by Kubernetes for all cluster data. Storing secrets as plaintext or ConfigMaps hands attackers the keys to your Kubernetes kingdom.
Use the advanced encryption standard (AES) to encrypt secrets and other sensitive data stored in etcd at rest. Kubernetes offers built-in support for secrets, but you can also integrate external secrets management solutions with stronger security features.
The API server is the nucleus of your cluster and should only be accessed by trusted users, systems, and IPs. Use TLS to encrypt communications, firewalls and network policies to restrict IP ranges, enforce authentication and authorization, and use audit logs to track access. If integrating with SSO, be sure to enable mTLS and OIDC. The Kubernetes API should be your most protected and monitored resource.
Your containers, clusters, and pods should be scanned to identify vulnerabilities, but manual scanning is time-consuming and inefficient. Image scanning tools automatically review containers, container images, image registries, and dependencies for CVEs and misconfigurations. Run scans at multiple levels during CI/CD:
Always block deployments with high-severity CVEs to avoid shipping containers with outdated libraries, rootkits, or cryptominers.
Auditing allows administrators of Kubernetes environments to review a sequence of actions in a cluster and answer who/what/when/where/why/how questions about certain events. Kubernetes provides native auditing features that continuously log, monitor, and audit all activities to identify vulnerabilities and threats. CNAPPs and other security tools like EDR also offer continuous logging, monitoring, and auditing of activities to identify vulnerabilities and threats,
Cloud workload protection platforms (CWPPs) protect workloads by providing visibility into activity, detecting threats, and applying security policies across various environments. They offer container firewalling and forensics and use machine learning and rules-based threat detection to respond with precision.